New book on the Black P. Stone Nation[El Rukns]

• 

The weight of command appears to fall heavily on shoulders of Jeff Fort,… (Ernie Cox, Jr./Tribune photo)

February 18, 2011|By Courtney Crowder | Tribune reporter

More than a decade before the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks, Jeff Fort, longtime Chicagoan and former leader of the Blackstone Rangers, which morphed into El Rukn, one of the city’s most lethal street gangs, and some of his fellow gang members were the first Americans to be convicted of domestic terrorism, according to “The Almighty Black P Stone Nation: The Rise, Fall and Resurgence of an American Gang.”

The new book by native Chicagoans Natalie Y. Moore, the South Side reporter covering urban issues for radio station WBEZ-FM, and Lance Williams, associate professor of inner-city studies at Northeastern Illinois University, details decades of changes within the Stones from the group’s formation to its involvement and possible misuse of funds from Lyndon B. Johnson’s War on Poverty to the El Rukns eventual connection with the Nation of Islam and Minister Louis Farrakhan.

Q: What is the Black P Stone Nation and where did it come from?

Moore: The Black P Stone Nation is a street organization that was formed in the late 1950s and early 1960s. They had many names affixed to them: the Blackstone Rangers, the Almighty Black P Stone Nation, the El Rukns, the Stones, the Rangers. The group was founded by young black men, teenagers, and it grew over the years. They were engaged in political activity, civil rights, black power, community organizing and outreach, but there was always a street element too. What we try to do in this book is characterize them in a holistic manner.

Q: How did the group evolve into El Rukn?

Williams: There has always been a strong presence of various Islamic schools of thought in correctional facilities across America. So while Jeff Fort was in prison from 1971 to 1976, he was introduced to the Islamic teachings of the Moorish Science Temple of America. When Jeff was released from federal prison, he changed the name of the organization to reflect the new direction and ideology of the group. Upon this transformation, the Stones became El Rukn, which means “foundation” in Arabic.

Q: What exactly is going on today with the Stones?

Williams: After the U.S. government successfully convicted Fort and a group of El Rukns for plotting (to commit domestic acts of terrorism) with Libyan operatives, the infrastructure of the group began to unravel, (and) a new era driven by the emergence of crack cocaine changed the direction of the organization. In the book, we talk about a renegade state of today’s Stones and other street organizations that has led to a lot of the violence and problems on the streets today.

Q: Why did you two decide to write this book?

Moore: Nothing had been written about the Stones, and I think our respective work in the community led us to write the book. Lance is an (activist-scholar) who spent most of his academic career working with street organizations, and then me, as an urban affairs reporter, I wanted to make some larger sense of this story. This is Chicago history and American history.

Q: How did you go about researching for this book?

Moore: We conducted interviews and looked at court documents, transcripts from U.S. Senate subcommittee hearings (on civil unrest in urban areas) and archives at the Newberry Library. There was a lot of public record information that was here in addition to getting the oral stories (from members of the nation).

Upland Squatters Claim Religious Group Deeded Them House

A couple in Upland was arrested yesterday for squatting in a foreclosed house; they were caught when the house’s real estate agent went by and found a moving van out front. She tells theDaily Bulletin, “This guy was in a moving van and he jumps out of the van and he says ‘Get off of my property. I’m gonna have you arrested.’” The pair had apparentlyfurnished the entire five bedroom “upscale” house since the last legit owner moved out in December. But these people aren’t careless–they covered their tracks by forging a deed trust document and “tried to cloud up the title owner sequence for the property by indicating on the deed that he was granting the home to the Moorish Science Temple of America, and they were in turn granting it back to him.” According to our friend Wikipedia(what a trustee friend), the Moorish Science Temple of America is a once-large, now-tiny American Islamic sect founded in the early twentieth century: “Its primary tenet was the belief that there was a Negroid-looking population of aboriginals which existed prior to the Transatlantic Slave Trade that was subsequently confused with African people.” Its website does not list any temples in California. [The house and Moorish Science Temple of America founder Noble Drew Ali]
· Couple under arrest [Daily Bulletin]

Grandson of Moorish King George III and his family murdered by usurpers. Truth comes to light..

Mystery of murdered Russian Tsar’s missing children solved by DNA study

All five children of Russia’s last Tsar were murdered by the Bolsheviks, according to a new DNA analysis that ends decades of conspiracy theories about family members who had escaped abroad.

Russia’s last tsar Nicholas II (L) and his wife Tsarina Alexander Fyodorovna (2ndR) and children Prince Alexei and Princesses Olga, Tatyana, Maria and Anastasia Photo: EPA

By Alastair Jamieson

8:13AM GMT 11 Mar 2009

A study based on detailed evidence from the exhumed remains of the Romanovs concludes the whole family was slaughtered in 1918 in the wake of the Russian revolution.[pictured Tsar Nicholas & Cousin George V of England ]

The results show none of the children of Tsar Nicholas II or his wife Tsarina Alexandra survived the execution, ending speculation that surviving members of the dynasty had fled the country to start a new life elsewhere.

The gunshot-and-bayonet murders took place in July 1918 in a cellar in the city of Ekaterinburg, central Russia.

Since then, about 200 people have claimed to descend from one or other of the Romanovs who had somehow survived the slaughter in the basement of Ipatiev House.

The claims were bolstered by the fact that the grave in which the Romanovs were buried was found to contain the bodies of only three of the children when it was finally examined following the collapse of Soviet Union in 1991.

RELATED ARTICLES

• Skeleton found in tree 29 years after suicide

03 Apr 2009

• Russia admits Nicholas II was victim

[King George III, grandfather of the cousins]

01 Oct 2008

A second grave was found by an amateur archaeologist in 2007, containing human bone fragments left over from an attempted cremation.

The DNA study, printed in the Public Library of Science and reported in The Independent, concludes these bone fragments were the remains of a girl and a boy, believed to be the crown prince Alexei and one of his four sisters.

The study said the only remaining mystery is whether the fourth sister buried with Alexei was Maria or Anastasia.

Earlier studies of DNA from the nine skeletons first grave were carried out by scientists including Peter Gill from Britain’s Forensic Science Service.

A comparison with the DNA of living Romanov relatives, including Prince Philip, proved that the family was that of the last Tsar and Tsarina and three daughters with the four remaining skeletons belonging to the family doctor and three servants.

 

The Mysterious Moor on the $2 Bill. Who can it be? And why using the bill can be risky!

Man arrested, cuffed after using $2 bills

Best Buy customer on being jailed:
‘At this point, I’m a mass murderer’

A man trying to pay a fee using $2 bills was arrested, handcuffed and taken to jail after clerks at a Best Buy store questioned the currency’s legitimacy and called police.

According to an account in the Baltimore Sun, 57-year-old Mike Bolesta was shocked to find himself taken to the Baltimore County lockup in Cockeysville, Md., where he was handcuffed to a pole for three hours while the U.S. Secret Service was called to weigh in on the case.

Bolesta told the Sun: “I am 6 feet 5 inches tall, and I felt like 8 inches high. To be handcuffed, to have all those people looking on, to be cuffed to a pole – and to know you haven’t done anything wrong. And me, with a brother, Joe, who spent 33 years on the city police force. It was humiliating.”

After Best Buy personnel reportedly told Bolesta he would not be charged for the installation of a stereo in his son’s car, he received a call from the store saying it was in fact charging him the fee. As a means of protest, Bolesta decided to pay the $114 bill using 57 crisp, new $2 bills.

As the owner of Capital City Student Tours, the Baltimore resident has a hearty supply of the uncommon currency. He often gives the bills to students who take his tours for meal money.

“The kids don’t see that many $2 bills, so they think this is the greatest thing in the world,” Bolesta says. “They don’t want to spend ‘em. They want to save ‘em. I’ve been doing this since I started the company. So I’m thinking, ‘I’ll stage my little comic protest. I’ll pay the $114 with $2 bills.’”

Bolesta explained what happened when he presented the bills to the cashier at Best Buy Feb. 20.

“She looked at the $2 bills and told me, ‘I don’t have to take these if I don’t want to.’ I said, ‘If you don’t, I’m leaving. I’ve tried to pay my bill twice. You don’t want these bills, you can sue me.’ So she took the money – like she’s doing me a favor.”

Bolesta says the cashier marked each bill with a pen. Other store employees began to gather, a few of them asking, “Are these real?”

“Of course they are,” Bolesta said. “They’re legal tender.”

According to the Sun report, the police arrest report noted one employee noticed some smearing of ink on the bills. That’s when the cops were called. One officer reportedly noticed the bills ran in sequential order.

Said Bolesta: “I told them, ‘I’m a tour operator. I’ve got thousands of these bills. I get them from my bank. You got a problem, call the bank.’ I’m sitting there in a chair. The store’s full of people watching this. All of a sudden, he’s standing me up and handcuffing me behind my back, telling me, ‘We have to do this until we get it straightened out.’

“Meanwhile, everybody’s looking at me. I’ve lived here 18 years. I’m hoping my kids don’t walk in and see this. And I’m saying, ‘I can’t believe you’re doing this. I’m paying with legal American money.’”

Bolesta was taken to the lockup, where he sat handcuffed to a pole and in leg irons while the Secret Service was called.

“At this point,” he says, “I’m a mass murderer.”

Secret Service agent Leigh Turner eventually arrived and declared the bills legitimate, adding, according to the police report, “Sometimes ink on money can smear.”

Commenting on the incident, Baltimore County police spokesman Bill Toohey told the Sun: “It’s a sign that we’re all a little nervous in the post-9/11 world.”

Update on Noble: Julius-Lucas: Ali-El

Written Confirmation that Clerk of Court will provide Disposition and Court Transcripts

The True Definition of “Free White Persons”

                                              TAKAO OZAWA v. UNITED STATES.

No. 1.

SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

260 U.S. 178

 ; 43 S. Ct. 65; 67 L. Ed. 199; 1922 U.S.

LEXIS 2357

Argued October 3, 4, 1922.

 November 13, 1922, Decided

The words “free white persons,” neither in their common and popular meaning, nor in their scientific definition, define a race or races, or prescribe a nativity or locus of origin.  They deal with personalities and the qualities of personalities, and are only susceptible of meaning those persons fit for citizenship and of the kind admitted to citizenship by the policy of the United States.  The words deal with individuals, not with races, nor with natives of any country or of any particular descent. The word “free” is an essential part of the clause. Under the Constitution, it is used in opposition to slave. It imports a freeman, a superior, as against an inferior class.  “White” we have already sufficiently defined, and shown that the words “free white persons” had in 1875 acquired a signification in American statute law as expressing a superior class as against a lower class, or, to speak explicitly, a class called “white” as against a class called “black”; the white man against the negro.  “Person” is “a living human being; a man, woman or child; an individual of the human race.” United States v. Crook, 25 Fed.  Cas. 695. The provisions of the Fourteenth Amendment in reference to persons “are universal in the application to all persons within the territorial jurisdiction without regard to any difference of race, or color, or nationality.” Yick Wo v. Hopkins, 118 U.S. 369. The same rule has been applied to include aliens under the Fifth and Sixth Amendments. Wong Wing v. United States, 163 U.S. 235.  No case has considered this point or given emphasis in the construction of the section to the words “free” and “persons,” which are as important to the construction as the word “white.” Nearly all think the section deals with races.  The question certified does not deal with individuals, but with a people, and the affirmative answer would exclude Japanese who is “white” in color and is of the Caucasian type and race.

George E Schaefer III Clerk of Norfolk Circuit Court – PUBLIC NOTICE OF DISHONOR

Bill of Lading Clerk of Court Norfolk #1 (2)

Writ of Precipae to Clerk of Court #2

Jurisdictional claim for Clerk of Court #3

 

International NOTICE OF FAULT IN DISHONOR BY DEPUTY CLERK GERALD STOKES, ACTING ON BEHALF OF HON. GEORGE E. SCHAEFER -

UCC 3-505

NOTICE OF INTERNATIONAL COMMERCIAL CLAIM WITHIN THE ADMIRALTY – U.C.C. 3-501 and U.C.C. Article 9

 

THIS IS THE FINAL NOTIFICATION AND JUDGMENT. NO OTHER NOTIFICATIONS WILL BE SENT TO YOU. COLLECTION OF THIS LAWFUL CLAIM, AGAINST YOUR BONDS, INSURANCE POLICIES, 401-K, FUNDS, PROPERTIES, OR ANY OTHER SOURCE OF REVENUE TO CURE YOUR DISHONOR IN THE PUBLIC WILL BEGIN IN THREE BUISNESS DAYS IF THE ATTACHED MANDATE (ALL 3 of 3 emails PDF scanned originals to be sent consecutively) IS NOT EXECUTED IN FULL. ADDITIONAL CIVIL DAMAGES AND CRIMINAL CHARGES MAY ALSO BE FORTHCOMING. NON RESPONSE IS A SELF EXECUTING POWER OF ATTORNEY TO FILE LIENS AND ENCUMBERANCES AGAINST ANY AND ALL PROPERTY OF THE LIBELLEES.

Princeps: William Salaam: Hall-El, ALL RIGHTS RESERVED UCC 1-308/1-103.6

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE:   Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited.  

Traffic Stop LAWFUL NOTICE with Fee Schedule

Registered Mail Receipt – Secretary of State N. Carolina  Bond #  RE06 3303 949US

For more information Go to:

Blacks Law Second-1910

http://motorvehicles.org/lawful-notice

http://motorvehicles.org/north-carolina/lawful-notice

Constitution of North Carolina

Princeps: William Salaam Hall El
Non-Domestic Mail
C/O 1589 Skeet Club Road Ste 102 #298
North Carolina Republic near [27265]

Traffic Stop LAWFUL NOTICE
Affidavit for Truth

Dear Police Officer, Code Enforcement Officer, Government Agent, Sheriff, Law Enforcement Officer, or Peace Officer, please, take notice of the Affidavit below, before you ‘Presume Contract Jurisdiction’ and attempt to Engage this Common Law Private Aboriginal Moor into Statutory Law, i.e.: Public Policy Enforcement.

The ‘Aboriginal Moor-American National Traveler’ honorably and passively, presenting this knowledge to you, is doing so in an attempt to protect you from yourself.  I have a great deal of respect for the ‘Public Service’ you are committed to, and understand how difficult it is to seek out and prosecute criminals. However, this Document is presented at a ‘traffic stop’, and therefore is a mandatory part of the Official Record of any ensuing action, and MUST be introduced as prima facie Discovery Evidence in said action.

It will be noted that willful suppression of ‘Evidence’ is a ‘Felony’. Any cause for action will result in a lawsuit under USC Title 18, Title 28, and Title 42, 1983.  This “NOTICE” has been submitted upon DEMAND of a ‘DRIVERS LICENSE,’ ‘Registration,’ ‘Proof of Insurance,’ or ANY other State issued Privilege, Permit or License (of which, NONE of these Statutes, this Aboriginal Moorish American Traveler is Liable, or Contracted to).  The U.S. Supreme Court ruled: ‘The unalienable “RIGHT” to travel is a part of the liberty of which the American Citizen cannot be deprived without due process of the law under the 5th Amendment’ See: Kent v. Dulles, 357 U.S. 116, 125.

Please, be informed that this Traveler is a “Secured Party” First Class Private Aboriginal Moor-National, and NOT a Second Class Public ‘Federal US citizen’, and, as such, has served your Administrative Agency, ‘Lawful Public Notice’ of his ‘Secured Party Status’ in the Community.
This ‘Certified Lawful Notice’ of his ‘UCC-1 Filing’, was recorded with the Washington Secretary of State at FEE NUMBER/File Number 2010-284-2258-8, as amended.  As a ‘Private Aboriginal Moor-American National’, inhabiting the land of Al-Moroc/Northwest Amexem  misnomer [North Carolina territory] near High Point, North Carolina state Republic, this Aborinal Moor-American National, has inherent Constitutional protection.  The most important Constitutional Right being, the Fifth Amendment Right: “To Remain Silent” (Miranda Warning).  Do not take offense, or be insulted because I choose to ‘Plead the Fifth’, i.e.: Remain Silent, and NOT be compelled to co-operate with your ‘verbal interrogation’.

“The Fifth Amendment provides that no person shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself in a criminal prosecution but also privileges him not to answer Official questions put to him in any other proceeding, civil or criminal, formal or informal, where the answers might incriminate him in future criminal proceedings.” LEFKOWITZ v. TURLEY, 94 S. CT. 316, 414 U.S. 70 (1973)
Due to this Sovereign Moor-American National’s past naivety with Statutory Law, this Traveler has since learned, that one cannot listen oneself into trouble. This Traveler now realizes it is a Public Official’s Intent, to lure one into a Verbal, then Written CONTRACT. .Therefore, this Traveler must inform you of his Rights, and not help you to coerce him into some Statute of which he is NOT Liable to.  This Traveler does not willfully choose to Consent to your “Offer To Contract”, nor to be ‘compelled’ To Incriminate himself by answering ANY questions and thereby Entering into ANY sort of Verbal Agreement.

Unless you have a Warrant for this Aboriginal Moor-American National’s Arrest, i.e.:  a ‘Valid Sworn Claim of Liability’, or have seen this Aboriginal Moor- American National Commit a Felony, you have NO Probable Cause to detain him, as he has the “Right to Free Travel”.

If you are Arresting this ‘Secured Party’, Moor-American National Without A Warrant, you must IMMEDIATELY take him before a Judicial Officer of competent jurisdiction, to determine whether the Arrest was lawful, or if there was ‘Probable Cause’ for the Arrest, or you will be held Personally Liable, and Accountable, for False Arrest (Kidnapping) and Sued in your Official Capacity. The arrest shall not be based upon hearsay, unless supported by a Warrant accompanied by a Bona Fide Affidavit. Said ‘Warrant’ and ‘Affidavit’ must be based upon first-hand knowledge of the Affiant who has a Claim against him, charging him with a Felony or other infamous crime. This Secured Party’ Sovereign Moor-American National must be allowed the right to face his accuser.

If you deny this ‘Secured Party’ Aboriginal Moor-American National that right, it will be a violation of The Sixth Amendment, and if you act unreasonably in your investigation or use excessive force, it will be a violation of The Fourth Amendment. This ‘Constitutional Rightful Demand’ must be met prior to booking. If you do not comply with this ‘Rightful Demand’ You Will Be Sued.  Please, also be informed that under the Rules of the “Uniform Commercial Code”, this First Class Aboriginal Moor-American is NOT engaged in ANY COMMERCIAL Activity (STATUTORY LAW) where MOTOR VEHICLE Licensing is mandatory. This ‘First Class Sovereign American’ is a “Free-Born and Natural Aboriginal Moor-American”, “riding a motor bike” or “traveling for pleasure in an Automobile”, and this “Conveyance” form of “Locomotion”, is his “Private Property’’ for private use, only.

The most important Constitutional Right being, the Fifth Amendment Right: “To Remain Silent” (Miranda Warning).  Do not take offense, or be insulted because I choose to ‘Plead the Fifth’, i.e.: Remain Silent, and NOT be compelled to co-operate with your ‘verbal interrogation’.  “The Fifth Amendment provides that no person shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself in a criminal prosecution but also privileges him not to answer Official questions put to him in any other proceeding, civil or criminal, formal or informal, where the answers might incriminate him in future criminal proceedings.” LEFKOWITZ v. TURLEY, 94 S. CT. 316, 414 U.S. 70 (1973)
Due to this Aboriginal Moor-American National’s past naivety with Statutory Law, this Traveler has since learned, that one cannot listen oneself into trouble. This Traveler now realizes it is a Public Official’s Intent, to lure one into a Verbal, then Written CONTRACT. .Therefore, this Traveler must inform you of his Rights, and not help you to coerce him into some Statute of which he is NOT Liable to.  This Traveler does not willfully choose to Consent to your “Offer To Contract”, nor to be ‘compelled’ To Incriminate himself by answering ANY questions and thereby Entering into ANY sort of Verbal Agreement.

Unless you have a Warrant for this Aboriginal Moor-American National’s Arrest, i.e.: a ‘Valid Sworn Claim of Liability’, or have seen this Aboriginal Moor- American Commit a Felony, you have NO Probable Cause to detain him, as he has the “Right to Free Travel”.

If you are Arresting this ‘Secured Party’, Moor-American National Without A Warrant, you must IMMEDIATELY take him before a Judicial Officer of competent jurisdiction, to determine whether the Arrest was lawful, or if there was ‘Probable Cause’ for the Arrest, or you will be held Personally Liable, and Accountable, for False Arrest (Kidnapping) and Sued in your Official Capacity. The arrest shall not be based upon hearsay, unless supported by a Warrant accompanied by a Bona Fide Affidavit. Said ‘Warrant’ and ‘Affidavit’ must be based upon first-hand knowledge of the Affiant who has a Claim against him, charging him with a Felony or other infamous crime. This Secured Party’ Aboriginal Moor-American must be allowed the right to face his accuser.

If you deny this ‘Secured Party’ Sovereign Moor-American National that right, it will be a violation of The Sixth Amendment, and if you act unreasonably in your investigation or use excessive force, it will be a violation of The Fourth Amendment. This ‘Constitutional Rightful Demand’ must be met prior to booking. If you do not comply with this ‘Rightful Demand’ You Will Be Sued.

Please, also be informed that under the Rules of the “Uniform Commercial Code”, this First Class Aboriginal Moor-American is NOT engaged in ANY COMMERCIAL Activity (STATUTORY LAW) where MOTOR VEHICLE Licensing is mandatory. This ‘First Class Sovereign American’ is a “Free-Born and Natural Sovereign American”, “riding a motor bike” or “traveling for pleasure in an Automobile”, and this “Conveyance” form of “Locomotion”, is his “Private Property’’ for private use, only.  This ‘First Class Sovereign Moor-American National’ is NOT “DRIVING OR OPERATING A Public Property ‘MOTOR VEHICLE”, therefore NOT Engaged in the ‘Activity of Commerce’, and therefore NOT Liable, under the “MOTOR VEHICLE STATUTORY LAW”, Or subject to your Jurisdiction.

If a ‘Public Official’ ‘Assumes Jurisdiction’ and insists in his/her pursuit in engaging a ‘Private Aboriginal Moor-American National’ without a “Viable Sworn Claim of Liability”, i.e.: ‘Affidavit’ or a ‘Warrant’ , s/he is “trespassing” and is therefore no longer ‘immune to prosecution’, and will be ‘held personally accountable’, in his/her ‘Private Capacity’ for acting outside of his/her ‘Official Capacity’ and will therefore be ‘charged’ with a ‘Hostile Act of Official Aggression’, in an Article 3 Court.  (The Supreme Court has held that the courts are open twenty-four hours a day, seven days a week, and three hundred sixty five days a year.)  Where a Secured Party’ Aboriginal Moor-American National
is detained, without a Warrant and without having committed a crime (traffic infractions are not crimes), the detention is a false arrest and false imprisonment.

Damages awarded; TREAEVANT v. CITY OF TAMPA, 241F2D.336 (11TH CIR.1984) Motorist illegally held for 23 minutes in a traffic charge was awarded $25,000 in damages. The above case sets the foundation for $75,000 dollars per hour, or $1,800,000 dollars per day.
The privilege is not ordinarily dependent upon the nature of the proceeding in which the testimony is sought or is to be used. It applies alike to civil and criminal proceedings, wherever this might tend to subject to criminal responsibility on him who gives it. The privilege protects a mere witness as fully as it does one who is a party defendant.” MC CARTHY v. ARNDSTEIN, 266 U.S. 34, 40, 45 S.CT. 16, 17, 69 L.ED. 158 (1924)

Please, BE FOREWARNED, IF you choose to Commit these FELONIES yourself, by DEMANDING one Surrender one’s DRIVERS LICENSE and/or REGISTRATION Without one’s Willful Consent, and you persist with: .1) Armed Assault (physically threaten one), 2) Extortion (Enter one into Contract, by Writing a Complaint, or Levying Fines without one’s permission), and 3) Identify Theft(one’s NAME is one’s private property, and you may not take this ‘Secured Party’ Moor-American National’s property or wrongfully convert any of one’s property, such as this Sovereign American’s personal photograph or fingerprints without Written Authority which is granted only after an adversary proceeding which complies completely with The Fifth Amendment due process rights, concluded with a signed order by a Judicial Officer of competent jurisdiction ordering the taking of said property), or 4) Kidnapping (Arrest without a Warrant) You will Be Held Personally Accountable, Liable, and Sued for Damages; BOTH under your OFFICIAL and Individual Capacities, for your “Hostile Act of Official Aggression”.
If a ‘Public Official’ wishes to communicate with this ‘Secured Party’, s/he can do so, through correspondence by mail, to the address of:

Princeps:  William Salaam: Hall-El©™ (Secured Party)
Non-Domestic Mail
Care of: 1589 Skeet Club Road Ste 102 #298, High Point, North Carolina republic near [27265]

Let this ‘Notice’ serve as a mandatory part of the ‘Official Record’ of any ensuing action, and therefore Must be introduced as prima facie evidence in said action. It will be noted that willful suppression of evidence is a felony. Any cause for action will result in a lawsuit under USC Title 18, Title 28, and Title 42, 1983.  “…there can be no doubt that the Fifth Amendment privilege is available outside of criminal court proceedings and serves to protect persons in all settings in which their freedom of action is curtailed in any significant way from being compelled to incriminate themselves.” MIRANDA v. ARIZONA, 86 S. CT. 1602, 384 U.S. 436 (1966) Hale v. Henkel the united States supreme Court which speaking on the “Law of the Land.” The opinion of the court stated:

“The individual may stand upon his constitutional rights as a Citizen. He is entitled to carry on his private business in his own way. His power to contract is unlimited. He owes no duty to the State or to his neighbors, to divulge his business, or to open his doors to an investigation, so far as it may tend to incriminate him. He owes no duty to the State, since he receives nothing therefrom, beyond the protection of his life and property.  “His rights are such as existed by the Law of the Land (Common Law) long antecedent to the organization of the State, and can only be taken from him by due process of law, and in accordance with the Constitution.  “He owes nothing to the public so long as he does not trespass upon their rights.”  “…where the Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination is involved…the court has always construed its protection to ensure that an individual is not compelled to produce evidence which later may be used against him as an accused in a criminal action… The protection does not merely encompass evidence which may lead to criminal conviction, but includes information which would furnish a link in the chain of evidence that could lead to prosecution, as well as evidence which an individual reasonably believes could be used against him in a criminal prosecution.” HOFFMAN v. UNITED STATES, 341 U.S. 479, 486, 71 S.CT.814, 95L.Ed. 1, 18 (1951) “in KASTIGAR v. UNITED STATES, 406 U.S. 441, 92 S. CT. 1653, 32 L. Ed. 212(1972), we recently reaffirmed the principle that the privilege against self incrimination can be asserted in any proceeding, civil or criminal, administrative or judicial, investigatory or adjudicatory. Id., at 444, 92 S. Ct. AT 1656; LEFKOWITZ v. TURLEY, 414 U.S. 70, 94 S. CT.316, 322, 38 L. Ed. 274 (1973).  “WE have recently noted that the privilege against self-incrimination — the essential mainstay of our adversary system—is founded in a complex of values… To maintain a fair state individual balance, to require the government to shoulder the entire load… to protect the inviolability of the human personality, our accusatory system of criminal justice demands that the government seeking to punish an Individual produce the evidence against him by its own independent labors, rather than by the cruel, simple expedient of compelling it from his own mouth… In sum, the privilege is fulfilled only when the person is guaranteed the right to remain silent unless he chooses to speak in the unfettered exercise of his own will.”

Please also NOTE: the above, as stated by the Supreme Court, are rights and privileges as guaranteed by the Constitution, and anyone (including judges) who knowingly violates those rights may be civilly and criminally liable under several federal statutes. Please see: United States Code, Title 18 Section 241 (Conspiracy against Rights), and Section 242 (Deprivation of Rights under Color of Law); Title 42 Section 1983, 1985, 1986 (Civil Rights)

Any violation of My Rights or failure to Stop another from violating them, by a Public Servant Who has the Legal Duty and Power to Protect those rights, shall constitute a Crime.  IF YOU CHOOSE TO IGNORE THESE WARNINGS it will show bad faith on your part, and prima facie evidence of your deliberate indifference to Constitutionally mandated rights. A copy of this instrument will be prima facie evidence of your bad faith. YOU Will Be Held Personally Accountable, Liable, and Sued for Damages; BOTH under your Official and Individual Capacities.  Remember, YOU Are “Doing Business As” A Public Servant, and as such, you are expected to treat me with due respect, as I respectfully thank you, for reading this NOTICE OF INTENT. .
Officer, I cannot and will not Offer you any information that may later be used against me in a Civil or Criminal proceeding. This includes producing documents that may or may not, be in my possession. If there is some important information that you wish to impart upon me, please do so in a respectful manner. I do hope you will have a good day.

Respectfully submitted,

:WILLIAM-SALAAM:HALL-EL©™, including any and all derivatives whether they be capitalized or otherwise amended, annotated or abbreviated thereof.
My Copyright

Rights retained by the Moors



Page 475, section 2

Now, the following are truths which a knowledge of the history of the world, and particularly of that of our own country, compels us to know–that the African Negro race never have been acknowledged as belonging to the family of nations; that as amongst them there never has been known or recognized by the inhabitants of other countries anything partaking of the character of nationality, or civil or political polity; that this race has been by all the nations of Europe regarded as subjects of capture or purchase.

DECEMBER TERM, 1856. 407

Page 476, Section 2

For who, it may be asked, is a citizen ? What do the character and status of citizen import? Without fear of contradiction, it does not import the condition of being private property, the subject of individual power and ownership. Upon a principle of etymology alone, the term citizen, as derived from civitas, conveys the ideas of connection or identification with the State or Government, and a participation of its functions. But beyond this, there is not, it is believed, to be found, in the theories of writers on Government, or in any actual experiment heretofore tried, an exposition of the term citizen, which has not been understood as conferring the actual possession and enjoyment, or the perfect right of acquisition and enjoyment, of an entire equality of privileges, civil and political.

Thus Vattel, in the preliminary chapter to his Treatise on the Law of Nations, says: “ Nations or States are bodies politic; societies of men united together for the purpose of promoting their mutual safety and advantage, by the joint efforts of their mutual strength. Such a society has her affairs and her interests; she deliberates and takes resolutions in common; thus becoming a moral person, who possesses an understanding and a will peculiar to herself.”

Again, in the first chapter of the first book of the Treatise just quoted, the same writer, after repeating his definition of a State, proceeds to remark, that, “from the very design that induces a number of men to form a society, which has its common interests and which is to act in concert, it is necessary that there should be established a public authority, to order and direct what is to be done by each, in relation to the end of the association.

This political authority is the Sovereignty.” Again this writer remarks: “The authority of all over each member essentially belongs to the body politic or the State.” By this same writer it is also said : “The citizens are the members of the civil society; bound to this society by certain duties, and subject to its authority; they equally participate in its advantages. The natives, or natural-born citizens, are those born in the country, of parents who are citizens. As society cannot perpetuate itself otherwise then by the children of the citizens, those children naturally follow the condition of their parents, and succeed to all their rights.”

Copyright Notice

Copyright Notice: All rights reserved regarding common-law copyright of trade-name/trade-mark, WILLIAM SALAAM HALL©™—as well as any and all derivatives and variations in the spelling of said trade name/trade-mark–Common Law Copyright © 2009 by :Willam-Salaam Hall©™. Said common-law trade-names/trade-marks, WILLIAM SALAAM HALL©, WILLIAM S HALL©, WILLIAM S. HALL© may neither be used, nor reproduced, neither in whole nor in part, nor in any manner whatsoever, without the prior, express, written consent and acknowledgement of :Willam Salaam Hall©™, hereinafter “Secured Party.” With the Intent of being contractually bound, any juristic person, as well as the agent of said juristic person, shall display, nor otherwise use in any manner, any of the common-law trade-name/trade-mark WILLIAM SALAAM HALL ™, nor the common-law copyright described herein, nor any derivative of, nor any variation in the spelling of, WILLIAM SALAAM HALL©™, without the prior, express, written consent and acknowledgement of Secured Party, as signified by Secured Party’s signature in red ink. Secured Party neither grants, nor implies, nor otherwise gives consent for any unauthorized use of WILLIAM SALAAM HALL©™, and all such unauthorized use is strictly prohibited. Secured Party is not now, nor has Secured Party ever been, an accommodation party, nor a surety, for the purported debtor, i.e. “WILLIAM SALAAM HALL” nor for any derivative of, nor for any variation in the spelling of, said name, nor for any other juristic person, and is so-indemnified and held harmless by Debtor, i.e. “WILLIAM SALAAM HALL” in Hold-harmless and Indemnity Agreement No. WSH-092172-HHIA dated the Nineteenth Day of the Eighth Month in the Year of Our Lord One Thousand Nine Hundred seventy-two against any and all claims, legal actions, orders, warrants, judgments, demands, liabilities, losses, depositions, summonses, lawsuits, costs, fines, liens, levies, penalties, damages, interests, and expenses whatsoever, both absolute and contingent, as are due and as might become due, now existing and as might hereafter arise, and as might be suffered by, imposed on, and incurred by Debtor for any and every reason, purpose, and cause whatsoever. Self-executing Contract/Security Agreement in Event of Unauthorized use: By this Copyright Notice, both the juristic person and the agent of said juristic person, hereinafter jointly and severally “User,” consent and agree that any use of WILLIAM SALAAM HALL©™ other than authorized use as set forth above constitutes unauthorized use, counterfeiting, of Secured Party’s common-law copyrighted property, contractually binds User, renders this Copyright Notice a Security Agreement wherein User is debtor and William Salaam Hall© is Secured Party, and signifies that User: (1) grants Secured Party a security interest in all of Users assets, land and personal property, and all of User’s interest in assets, land, and personal property, in the sum certain amount of $500,000.00 per each occurrence of use of any of the common-law-copyrighted trade-name/trade-mark WILLIAM SALAAM HALL ©™, as well as for each and every occurrence of use of any and all derivatives of, and variations in the spelling of, WILLIAM SALAAM HALL ©™, plus costs, plus triple damages; (2) authenticates this Security Agreement wherein User is debtor and Willam Salaam Hall©™ is Secured Party, and wherein User pledges all of User’s property; i.e. all assets, land, consumer goods farm products, inventory, equipment, money, investment property, commercial tort claims, letters of credit, letter-of-credit rights, chattel paper, instruments, deposit accounts, accounts, documents, and general intangibles, and all User’s interest in all such foregoing property, now owned and hereafter acquired, now existing and hereafter arising, and wherever located, as collateral for securing User’s contractual obligation in favor of Secured Party for Users unauthorized use of Secured Party’s common-law and commercial copyrighted property; (3) consents and agrees with Secured Party’s filing of a UCC Financing Statement in the UCC filing office, as well as in any county recorder’s office, wherein User is debtor and :Willam-Salaam Hall-El©™ is Secured Party; (4) consents and agrees that said UCC Financing Statement described above in paragraph “(3)” is a continuing financing statement, and further consents and agrees with Secured Party’s filing of any continuation statement necessary for maintaining Secured Party’s perfected security interest in all of User’s property and interest property, pledged as collateral in this Security Agreement and described above in paragraph “(2),” until User’s contractual obligation theretofore incurred has been fully satisfied; (5) consents and agrees with Secured Party’s filing of any UCC Financing Statement, as described above in paragraphs “(3)” and “(4),” as well as the filing of any Security Agreement, as described above in paragraph “(2),” in the UCC filing office, as well as in any county recorder’s office; (6) consents and agrees that any and all such filings described in paragraphs “(4)” and “(5)” above are not, and may not be considered, bogus, and that User will not claim that any such filing is bogus; (7) waives all defenses; and (8) appoints Secured Party as Authorized Representative for User, effective upon User’s default re User’s contractual obligations in favor of Secured Party as set forth below under “Payment Terms” and “Default Terms,” granting Secured Party full authorization and power for engaging in any and all actions on behalf of User, as Secured Party, in Secured Party’s sole discretion, deems appropriate, and User further consents and agrees that this appointment of Secured Party as Authorized Representative for User, effective upon User’s default, is irrevocable and coupled with a security interest. User further consents and agrees with all of the following additional terms of Self-executing Contract/Security Agreement in Event of Unauthorized Use: Payment Terms: In accordance with fees for unauthorized use of WILLIAM SALAAM HALL © as set forth above, User hereby consents and agrees that User shall pay Secured Party all unauthorized-use fees in full within ten (10) days of the date User is sent Secured Party’s invoice, hereinafter “invoice,” itemizing said fees. Default Terms: In event of non-payment in full of all unauthorized use fees by User within ten (10) days of date invoice is sent. User shall be deemed in default and: (a) all of User’s property and interest in property pledged as collateral by User, as described above in paragraph “(2),” immediately becomes, i.e. is property of Secured Party; (b) Secured Party is appointed User’s Authorized Representative as set forth above in paragraph “(8)”; and (C) User consents and agrees that Secured Party may take possession of, as well as otherwise dispose of in any manner that Secured Party, in Secured Party’s sole discretion, deems appropriate, including, but not limited by, sale at auction, at any time following User’s default, and without further notice, any and all of User’s former property and interest in property, as described above in paragraph “(2),” formerly pledged as collateral by User, now property of Secured Party, in respect of this “Self-executing Contract/Security Agreement in Event of Unauthorized Use,” that Secured Party, again in Secured Party’s sole discretion, deems appropriate. Terms for Curing Default: Upon event of default, as set forth above under “Default Terms,” irrespective of any and all of User’s former property and interest in property, in the possession of, as well as disposed of by, Secured Party, as authorized above under “Default Terms,” User may cure User’s default re only the remainder of User’s former property and interest in property formerly pledged as collateral that is neither in the possession of, nor otherwise disposed of by, Secured Party within twenty (20) days of date of User’s default only by payment in full. Terms of Strict Foreclosure: Users non-payment in full of all unauthorized-use fees itemized in Invoice within said twenty- (20) day period for curing default as set forth above under “Terms for Curing Default” authorizes Secured Party’s immediate non-judicial strict foreclosure on any and all remaining property and interest in property formerly pledged as
collateral by User, now property of Secured Party, which is not in the possession of, nor otherwise disposed of by, Secured Party upon expiration of said twenty- (20) day default-curing period. Ownership subject to common-law copyright and UCC Financing Statement and Security Agreement filed with the UCC filing office. Record Owner: :Willam-Salaam :Hall-El©™, Autograph Common Law Copyright ©2009. Unauthorized use of any of “:Willam-Salaam :Hall-El©™” incurs same unauthorized-use fees as those associated with WILLIAM SALAAM HALL ©™, WILLIAM S HALL©™ and any and all derivatives as set forth above in paragraph “(1)” under “Self-executing Contract/Security Agreement in Event of Unauthorized Use.”